C 'is the need to return, and many other times it does, the big theme of the organization . This time trying to investigate a matter that we had outlined in my previous post on the surface, or the dialectic between means and ends. This will allow us to better understand the absolute necessity for the next revolutionary wave is characterized in its practice, which also means in his theory, so as to break the separation between the two terms of the dialectic described above.
P er the issue as it may seem abstract, in reality, it takes on a very concrete. Building organizational forms such as to overcome the gap between means and ends means, above all, strive to offer to those most suitable instruments for their implementation, to imagine new possibilities and different, thanks to which the failure to overcome the past and start to defeat the inconclusiveness of the present.
S the question of ethics in the body inoculate the seed of future forms revolutionary organization. This is not to rouge the posture of militancy, but for practical reasons.
C dare Ezequiel Adamovky writes in his policy autonomy : "In general, both in practice and in theory, the attitude towards the left 'ethics - that is the principle which must guide us to good actions will disting them from bad ones - is to consider it merely a "epistemological". In other words, policy actions are considered "good" if they correspond a "truth" known in advance. The question of what is ethically good or evil is thus reduced to the problem of a political "line" correct or incorrect. In this way, the left often ends up rejecting all ethical implication of the aid of the other (and I mean the concrete other, our fellow men), while the left replaces it with a certain ideology-truth that you want representative of another "abstract" ("Humanity"). The actual effects of this lack of ethics can be seen in our actual practice in many cases in which political activists, otherwise entirely well-intentioned, manipulate and inflict violence on others in the name of "truth." (Not surprisingly, then, if the common people prefer tenersene rough). This attitude is not only wrong for his lack of ethics, but also because it is often unconsciously elitist and prevents an effective partnership between equals. If you think you possess the truth do not stand to "lose" time listening to others, nor will you be willing to negotiate on consensus. This is the reason why a genuine policy of emancipation should be based on a firm and radical ethics of equality and responsibility towards others. We still have a long way in this direction if we want to create, disseminate and embody a new ethic. Fortunately, many movements are already working in this direction. The slogan of the Zapatistas' walk at the speed of the slowest "is nothing but the reversal of the relationship between truth and ethics [...]". We feel important to share the load.
