U of the themes of which will discuss on this blog is the relationship between politics and anti-politics . In recent months, especially in our country, This theme has appeared particularly important in relation to two facts: on the one hand more and more apparent indifference on the part of ordinary citizens, medium, to the themes and characters of institutional policy, intended for party, on the other hand, the gradual break scene of mass media phenomenon linked to Beppe Grillo Meetups to her, the various initiatives they have generated in the first place the so-called V-Day. To confirm this, we witness the fact that the main exponents of world political and institutional rush to issue his fatwa against the irresponsible behavior of those, Cricket in the head, spreading a defeatist spirit , indifferent, anticivico . I the theme, however, is obviously far more complex and goes beyond the Italic miseries, choruses on caste, on the lamentation bad policy. From our point of view it offers, instead, the opportunity to try to indicate, again, a new road, an unconventional path. Or at least to urge further consideration.
I n this direction seems interesting to take some considerations on the question of Marxism in terms of policy and state precisely, to verify a possible anti-political outcome, with the knowledge to move on land heretical from the viewpoint of many would-be followers of the German. As always we will proceed with the tracks, fragments of speech, hoping that it is taken up and elaborated by those who wish to do so.
T we grace to Marx. In Critical Notes on Article "The King of Prussia and Social Reform, signed: a Prussian", published on Vorwärts in two episodes in August 1844, Karl Marx writes: "The intellect political is political precisely because it thinks within the limits of politics. The more it is acute, the longer I live, much less is capable of understanding the social crime " . A first clear indication of the relationship between the political sphere and the social criticism in Marx the bourgeois thought, as we see.
L 'working hypothesis that we want to make here is the application of that critical also to thought and action that have inspired the great movements for social change, primarily the international communist movement, of the last century. In other words, the question is whether the essence of social revolution and the construction of a new company may or may not be subsumed into the political sphere and if this is not, rather, one of the main errors made by the revolutionaries of the twentieth century.
